Marek Bieniek <a...@s...re.invalid> napisał(a):

> > Ten link mi nie bangla. Podaj normalnie papier, issue etc, to powiem czy
> > znam i co o tym myślę:)


> Tutaj jest abstrakt tej publikacji:

> http://tinyurl.com/33lfe5

Obok tego abstraktu jest link do innego, ktorego autorem jest ten straszny
*szarlatan* Peter Duesberg ktory m.innymi pisze tak:

I propose that AIDS is not a contagious syndrome caused by one conventional
virus or microbe. No such virus or microbe would require almost a decade to
cause primary disease, nor could it cause the diverse collection of AIDS
diseases.

Neither would its host range be as selective as that of AIDS, nor could it
survive if it were as inefficiently transmitted as AIDS. Since AIDS is defined
by new combinations of conventional diseases, it may be caused by new
combinations of conventional pathogens, including acute viral or microbial
infections and chronic drug use and malnutrition.


The long and unpredictable intervals between infection with HIV and AIDS would
then reflect the thresholds for these pathogenic factors to cause AIDS
diseases, instead of an unlikely mechanism of HIV pathogenesis.


http://tinyurl.com/2kemle

Co o tym myslisz?

--
Wysłano z serwisu Usenet w portalu Gazeta.pl -> http://www.gazeta.pl/usenet/