( someone hacked my e-mail address is: a...@g...com;

KTOS TEZ SCOPIOWAL TE GRUPE JAKO: PL.SCI.FILOSOFIA; UZYWA KSYWY:
'ROBAK'
BEDZIE PRZYPUSZCZALNIE PROBOWAL PRZEDJAC ODPOWIEDZI NA MOJ POST.
...
Call to depoliticize the science as the objective activity
( follow up to Ayan Rand

The U tube launches wide and insighful, I would risk, discussion
of young academics
that summarize long time stravings of political and philosophical
identity formation ( publisher
and the foundation has held the scholarship competition on the
interpretation of 'Atlas shrugged'; 'Fountainhead' and the
philosophy of objectivism for many years. That means thoughts on her
writing are not fresh, even when she is:)) I personally like most
esseys
on objectivism but its early formulation and 'Philosophy who needs it'
without agressive intercepts - a distortion in itself, so to 'catch'.

Fact and fiction of objectivism has a wide splash. I have some doubts
about the
pulling that was done towards the left while she is at the foundation
of American
conservatism, as stresses if not over stresses the adherance to the
truth, science,
dept in action without self sactifice but on its merit. I also
understand that before work
on objectivism came in, and later was written onto, she was young in
heart and act.

Containing all into the philosophical center of mind of its own making
( that as independent thinker as required for the topic and - as
percerceived) migh not necessary carry self contradiction.

Again, not all is written by original Ayan Rand yet can be embraced if
she in fact defined
well the philosophical and as others want political centrum. Political
life in fact splashes
into 3 streams or 3 branches ( these can keep collecting like the
river or that river).
As reported and interpreted these be: the in dept thought about
American conservatism;
the foundation of more thoughfull liberalism that we know now and the
libertarianism
however inadvertant. They might serve a sort of matrix of the
political spectrum
in the developed society and, as the mater of fact, they have.


Take the very good original book on policy, 'Agenda alternatives', the
early guide how
to get into heart of the good policy in Washington Capital, there they
are 3 sources
of the best for policy in the more comprehensive, less compulsive flow
of it.
The book is about inner mechanics and not the ideological branching of
political life.

( is this
objective that hackers never leave me nowodays?)

She was primarily a philosopher. Politics are magnetic social quality
we are
wise to let it reflect of philosophy as oppose try and try be "all
that" ( the politically
attractive narcists are falling off easy on both ends anyway). The
truth is less of it
and at the same time more in its eseence, a center of it.

Call to depoliticize science as objective activity is on.