tomla <t...@w...pl> napisał(a):

> Ze 99% populacji wydaje sie ze swiat i inni ludzie sa ulomni a my sami
> jestesmy idealami doskonalymi w kazdym calu , wykonujacymi wszelkie
> obowiazki doskonale, a wszelkie niepowodzenia sa efektem tylko i wylacznie
> "niedoskonalosci swiata" w jakim zyjemy, natomiast nie ma to nic wspolnego z
> naszymi ulomnosciami.

Znalazlem kilka bledow poznawczych, ktore sa odpowiedzialne za to zjawisko:

[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution
_error ]
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_attribution_error ]

[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positivity_effect ]
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negativity_effect ]

[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-serving_bias ]
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group-serving_bias ]

> Dlaczego tak jest? Jakie sa podloza takiego
> zachowania?

Jeden z zacytowanych artykulow efekt *Fundamental attribution error* tlumaczy
w niniejszy sposob:

Everyday example
You are walking up to a cashier at the grocery store to check out when a man
with two children cuts directly in front of you, arriving to pay the cashier
before you. You are likely to grumble and think "What an incredible jerk!"
Your default assumption is that the person is ill-mannered. You do not realize
that the man did not even see you as his attention was largely focused on
keeping his two children with him and moving to the cashier. Thus, your
dispositional attribution for his behavior was, in this instance, incorrect.
The man simply did not see you as his attention was focused on his children.
(...)
Why the fundamental attribution error occurs?
One theoretical view holds that the error results largely from perspective.
When we observe other people, the person is the primary reference point. When
we observe ourselves, we are more aware of the forces acting upon us. So,
attributions for others&#8217; behavior are more likely to focus on the person we
see, not the situational forces acting upon that person that we may not be
aware of. In the parlance of psychology research, this is called salience --
more "salient" factors are more likely to be attributed as causal.


pozdrawiam
quasi-biolog



--
Wysłano z serwisu Usenet w portalu Gazeta.pl -> http://www.gazeta.pl/usenet/