Marcin Ciesielski napisał(a):

> Rozdział (napisany przez J. Aleksandrowicza) może wydawać się miejscami
> naiwny, jak na obecne czasy, ale czy nie wydaje się pod pewnym względem
> proroczy? Czy nie przewiduje powstania _neuronauki_ ?

http://www.db.dk/jni/lifeboat/Domains/Psychology_IV.
htm
Epistemology and Philosophy of Science for Information Scientists
Scientific psychology is concerned with the explanation and prediction
of behavior, thinking, emotions, relationships, potentials and
pathologies. It differs from sociology, anthropology, economics, and
political science, in part, by studying the behavior of individuals
(alone or in groups) rather than the behavior of the groups or
aggregates ). According to Robins, Gosling & Craik (1999), psychologists
typically work within one of the following four research traditions:

* Psychoanalysis
* Behaviorism
* Cognitive psychology
* _Neuroscience_

*Czy nie da się zauważyć, że to ostatnie podejście jest u nas wyraźnie
lekceważone i ośmieszane?*

Consequently, while some cognitive psychologists claim that theories of
the human mind and cognitive information processing must be based on
studies of the dynamics of the mind's semantic level as governed by the
logical rules and control mechanisms at the mind's syntactic level,
neuroscientists are engaged with the study of the mechanical level. They
believe psychology can be reduced to neuroscience, and their goal is
thus to explain and predict human behavior, thinking, emotions,
relationships, potentials and pathologies from physiological studies of
the human brain.