« poprzedni post | |
Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!pingwin.icm.edu.pl!news.icm.edu.pl!news.atman.pl!newsfe ed.tpinternet.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail From: "Mapet\(ka\)" <m...@p...onet.pl> Newsgroups: pl.rec.uroda Subject: Re: Lysanel Active kontra Effaclar K Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:41:12 +0200 Organization: tp.internet - http://www.tpi.pl/ Lines: 10 Message-ID: <am4908$7eq$1@news.tpi.pl> References: <aluqi0$ife$1@news2.tpi.pl> <am1djk$6d4$1@news.tpi.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.134.138.130 X-Trace: news.tpi.pl 1032169288 7642 213.134.138.130 (16 Sep 2002 09:41:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: u...@t...pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:41:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.rec.uroda:8655 Ukryj nagłówki > "Osławiony" jak dla mnie, nie daje super efektu, natomiast Lysanel i |
Zobacz także