Re: Praca badawcza nt. oddzialywania infradzwiekow w budynkach/ biurach (dlugie)

Liczba wypowiedzi w tym wątku: 5

1. Data: 2002-02-27 08:02:49

Temat: Re: Praca badawcza nt. oddzialywania infradzwiekow w budynkach/ biurach (dlugie)
Od: "howk" <n...@p...onet.pl> szukaj wiadomości tego autora

Użytkownik "Jacek" <g...@p...onet.pl> napisał w wiadomości
news:1450-1014765643@pd57.katowice.sdi.tpnet.pl...
> (dlugie ale bardzo wartosciowe , dgy wyjasnia wszystko nt. infradzwiekow
> jako broni )
> http://www.borderlands.com/archives/arch/gavreaus.ht
m
>
> The Sonic Weapon of Vladimir Gavreau
> by Gerry Vassilatos
>
> HE listened and closed his eyes as the rolling waves of sound poured
> over and through his being. Thrilling, intoxicating, the
> hysteria of heaven, the enthralled and frightening flight of angels.
> Electrifying. Messaiens organ music signalled messages of
> meaning, titanic foghorns ululating among dimly perceived near-worlds.
> Olivier Messaien, master composer of musical
> expressionism, used the ground thrumming tones of great Parisian
> cathedral organs to evoke sensations which may only be
> called otherworldly. Masterfully macabre. Black foundations, blue
> pillars, and rainbow ceilings.
>
> Sound, rhythm, and space. Ultra-chromatic chord frames, rising like rock
> walls from the black depths. And immense stellar
> crystallizations, radiating tonal perfumes through deep and black
> radiant space. Lovely and lyrically swooping melodies, the
> flight of birds through delicate limbs. And melodic lines, reaching up
> toward unknown depths of space, each had their
> foundation in ultrabass tones of rooted depth. The basso profunda of
> Messaien are the critical foundations, the strong vertical
> pillars of an immense architecture which extends beyond performance
> walls. He scoured the deep and unreachable roots of
> worlds to hold his musical cathedrals together. Such majesty and
> grandeur of sound! Rich in the intelligence which flooded and
> made the world, the musical currents and the atmosphere of tones.
> Fluidic music and meaning.
>
> The most fundamental signals which permeate this world are inaudible.
> They not only surpass our hearing, but they undergird
> our being. Natural infrasounds rumble through experience daily. There
> manifestations are fortunately infrequent and incoherent.
> Infrasound is inaudible to human hearing, being of pitch below 15 cycles
> per second. The bottom human limit. The plynth. The
> foundation. Infrasound is not heard, it is felt. Infrasound holds a
> terrible secret in its silent roar.
>
> Infrasound produces varied physiological sensations which begin as vague
> "irritations". At certain pitch, infrasound produces
> physical pressure. At specific low intensity, fear and disorientation.
> Nazi propaganda engineers methodically used infrasound to
> stir up the hostilities of crowds who were gathered to hear their
> madman. The results are historical nightmares.
>
> At a very specific pitch, infrasound explodes matter. At others,
> infrasound incapacitates and kills. Organisms rupture in its blast.
> Sea creatures use this power to stun and kill prey.
>
> The swelling bass tones of the cathedral seem as though they can burst
> the very pillars which uphold the ancient vaults. Stained
> glass windows have been known to erupt in a shower of colored fragments
> from the organs basso profunda. Impulsed
> ultrabass tones...thunder. Somewhere in the almost inaudible roll of
> these basement sounds there was a devastating and fearful
> power.
>
>
>
> THE ABYSS
>
> The Cold War was on. The United States alone held the dread secret. The
> most terrible weapon yet developed was the private
> property of one government. The mere existence of the atomic bomb was
> threat to nations whose motives were not entirely
> altruistic. Motivated, aggressive, and imperialistic, obtaining atomic
> bomb data was a priority for several nations. The only
> manner in which some nations obtained the secret was by stealing it.
> When Stalins science officers finally developed an atomic
> duplicate of the American bomb, pressure suddenly was placed upon every
> other European nation to achieve an equivalent or
> better device.
>
> When one seeks to defend ones borders, the consequences of releasing
> weapons of devastation to the world do not seem
> important. Weaponry is death-oriented by nature. But there are moral
> differences between weapons of defense and weapons
> of offense. Previous to this atomic proliferation, competing nations
> concentrated their weapons research on truly bizarre and
> equally deadly means for defending their national boundaries. A great
> variety of such deadly weapons were perfected in rapid
> succession. This included deadly variations and combinations of gas
> weaponry, pathogenic agents, and radiant weaponry.
> Stalins research teams investigated psychic powers as a possible means
> for destroying an enemy. Psychotronic warfare was
> developed among numerous groups, both private and national, with
> measurable success. Information on some simpler
> psychotronic weapons have recently been obtained through an increasing
> process of Soviet disclosure.
>
> In truth, the larger the weaponry the less safe the national boundaries
> truly were. While the superpowers concentrated their
> weapons development programs on mass-destructive nuclear weaponry,
> others focussed on more practical conventions. The
> limited tactical warfare of small battlefields seemed a more immediate
> need. While developing their own atomic device, France
> sought defensive tactical weaponry on every possible technological
> front. Short range weapons would best defend against a
> conventional national assault. But other systems were also sought;
> systems which, though non-nuclear, were equally invincible.
> As the great Frankish Knight, Charles "the Hammer" Martel repelled
> ruthless invaders from the medieval east, so a new
> hammer would be sought to defend France against possible new enemies
> from the east. Even as Charles Martel arose from
> obscurity, so this strange new "hammer" would arise in equal obscurity.
>
>
>
> GAVREAU
>
> The central research theme of Dr. Vladimir Gavreau was the development
> of remote controlled automatons and robotic
> devices. To this end he assembled a group of scientists in 1957. The
> group, including Marcel Miane, Henri Saul, and Raymond
> Comdat, successfully developed a great variety of robotic devices for
> industrial and military purposes. In the course of
> developing mobile robots for use in battlefields and industrial fields,
> Dr. Gavreau and his staff made a strange and astounding
> observation which, not only interrupted their work, but became their
> major research theme.
>
> Housed in a large concrete building, the entire group periodically
> experienced a disconcerting nausea which flooded the
> research facility. Day after day, for weeks at a time, the symptoms
> plagued the researchers. Called to inspect the situation,
> industrial examiners also fell victim to the malady. It was thought that
> the condition was caused by pathogens, a "building
> sickness". No such agencies were ever biologically detected. Yet the
> condition prevailed. Research schedules now seriously
> interrupted, a complete examination of the building was called.
>
> The researchers noticed that the mysterious nauseations ceased when
> certain laboratory windows were blocked. It was then
> assumed that "chemical gas emissions" of some kind were responsible for
> the malady, and so a thorough search of the building
> was undertaken. While no noxious fumes could be detected by any
> technical means, the source was finally traced by building
> engineers to an improperly installed motor-driven ventilator. The
> engineers at first thought that this motor might be emitting
> noxious fumes, possibly evaporated oils and lubricants. But no
> evaporated products were ever detected. It was found that the
> loosely poised low speed motor, poised in its cavernous duct of several
> stories, was developing "nauseating vibrations".
>
> The mystery magnified for Dr. Gavreau and his team, when they tried to
> measure the sound intensity and pitch. Failing to
> register any acoustic readings at all, the team doubted the assessment
> of the building engineers. Nevertheless, closing the
> windows blocked the sense of nausea. In a step of brilliant scientific
> reasoning, Gavreau and his colleagues realized that the
> sound with which they were dealing was so low in pitch that it could not
> register on any available microphonic detector. The
> data was costly to the crew.
>
> They could not pursue the "search" for long time periods. During the
> very course of tracking the sound down, an accidental
> direct exposure rendered them all extremely ill for hours. When finally
> measured, it was found that a low intensity pitch of a
> fundamental 7 cycles per second was being produced. Furthermore, this
> infrasonic pitch was not one of great intensity either. It
> became obvious that the slow vibrating motor was activating an
> infrasonic resonant mode in the large concrete duct. Operating
> as the vibrating "tongue" of an immense "organ pipe", the rattling motor
> produced nauseating infrasound. Coupled with the rest
> of the concrete building, a cavernous industrial enclosure, the
> vibrating air column formed a bizarre infrasonic "amplifier".
>
> Knowledge of this infrasonic configuration also explained why shutting
> the windows was mildly effective in "blocking the
> malady". The windows altered the total resonant profile of the building,
> shifting the infrasonic pitch and intensity. Since this time,
> others have noted the personally damaging effects of such infrasonic
> generation in office buildings and industrial facilities. The
> nauseating effects of exposure to a low intensity natural or manmade
> infrasonic source is now well appreciated.
>
> It has become a routine architectural procedure to seek out and alter
> any possible such resonant cavities. The sources often
> appear in older buildings, the result of construction rendered faulty by
> previous lack of this knowledge. All such "improper"
> architectural formats are modified by the additions of sound-blocking
> materials.
>
>
>
> WHISTLES
>
> Dr. Gavreau and his research team now carefully investigated the effects
> of their "infrasonic organ" at various intensity levels and
> pitch. Changing the spring tension on shock mounts which held the fan
> motor, it was possible to change the pitch. Various
> infrasonic resonances were established throughout the large research
> building. Shutting the windows blocked most of the
> symptoms. When the window was again opened, however weak as the source
> was made, the team felt the nauseating effects
> once again.
>
> In the business of military research, Dr. Gavreau believed he had
> discovered a new and previously "unknown weapon" in these
> infrasounds. Aware of the natural explosives by which infrasonics are
> generated, Dr. Gavreau began to speculate on the
> application of infrasonics as a defense initiative. The haphazard
> explosive effects of natural infrasound in thunderclaps were
> quite effective in demonstrating what an artificial "thunder-maker"
> could do. But, how could a thunderclap be artificially
> generated in a compact system? These thoughts stimulated theoretical
> discussions on the possibility of producing coherent
> infrasound: an infrasonic "laser".
>
> The first devices Dr. Gavreau implemented were designed to imitate the
> "accident" which first made his research group aware
> of infrasonics. They designed real organ pipes of exceedingly great
> width and length. The first of these was six feet in diameter
> and seventy five feet long. These designs were tested outdoors, securely
> propped against protective sound-absorbent walls.
> The investigators stood at a great distance. Two forms of these
> infrasonic organ pipes were built. The first utilized a drive piston
> which pulsed the pipe output. The second utilized compressed air in a
> more conventional manner.
>
> The main resonant frequency of these pipes occurred in the "range of
> death", found to lie between three and seven cycles per
> second. These sounds could not be humanly heard, a distinct advantage
> for a defense system. The effects were felt however.
> The symptoms come on rapidly and unexpectedly, though the pipes were
> operating for a few seconds. Their pressure waves
> impacted against the entire body in a terrible and inescapable grip. The
> grip was a pressure which came in on one from all sides
> simultaneously, an envelope of death.
>
> Next came the pain, dull infrasonic pressure against the eyes and ears.
> Then came a frightening manifestation on the material
> supports of the device itself. With sustained operation of the pipe, a
> sudden rumble rocked the area, nearly destroying the test
> building. Every pillar and joint of the massive structure bolted and
> moved. One of the technicians managed to ignore the pain
> enough to shut down the power supply.
>
> These experiments with infrasonics were as dangerous as those early
> investigations of nuclear energy. Dr. Gavreau and his
> associates were dangerously ill for nearly a day after these preliminary
> tests. These maladies were sustained for hours after the
> device was turned off. Infrasonic assaults on the body are the more
> lethal because they come with dreadful silence. The
> eyesight of Dr. Gavreau and his fellow workers were affected for days.
> More dangerously were their internal organs affected:
> the heart, lungs, stomach, intestinal cavity were filled with continual
> painful spasms for an equal time period.
>
> Musculature convulses, torques, and tears were the symptoms of
> infrasonic exposure. All the resonant body cavities absorbed
> the self-destructive acoustic energy, and would have been torn apart had
> the power not been extinguished at that precise
> moment. The effectiveness of infrasound as a defense weapon of
> frightening power having been demonstrated "to satisfaction",
> more questions were asked. After this dreadful accident, approaching the
> equipment once again was almost a fearful exercise.
> How powerful could the output of an infrasonic device be raised before
> even the operating engineers were affected?
>
> With greatest caution and respect for the power with which they worked,
> Dr. Gavreau began recalculating all of his design
> parameters. He had grossly misjudged the power released by the pipes. He
> had, in fact, greatly lowered those calculated
> outputs for diagnostic purposes. Never had he imagined that these
> figures were actually far too great in the world of infrasound!
>
> Empirical data being the only way to determine how infrasonic energy
> correlated with both biological and material effect, the
> tests were again attempted with a miniature power supply. First, the
> dimensions of these devices had to be greatly reduced.
> Their extreme length was objectionable. In order to provide absolutely
> safe control of the deadly blasts, several emergency
> cutoff switches were provided. These responded to the radiated
> infrasonic pressure wave. the intensity could be absolutely
> limited by use of automated barometric switches.
>
> In an attempt to achieve more compact and controllable infrasound
> generators, Dr. Gavreau designed and tested special horns
> and "whistles" of various volumes. These were each remarkably simple
> flat circular resonant cavities, having a side output duct.
> They were simply the large analogues of foghorns and police whistles.
> These flat forms were volumetrically reduced in
> successive design stages because it was found that their output was far
> too great. The infrasonic foghorns could produce a
> frightening two kilowatts of infrasonic energy, at a pitch of one
> hundred fifty cycles per second.
>
> The flat "police whistles" were more easily designed to required
> specifications. Their overall characteristics were quite simple to
> determine, a mathematical formula being devised for the purpose. The
> whistles resonant pitch was found by dividing its
> diameter into a numerical constant of 51. Increasing the depth of the
> whistle effectively increased its amplitude. A whistle 1.3
> meters in diameter produced an infrasonic pitch of 37 cycles per second.
> This form violently shook the walls of the entire
> laboratory complex, though its intensity was less than 2 watts
> infrasonic power.
>
>
>
> DANGER
>
> Not much amplitude is required for infrasound to produce physiological
> malady. Several researchers accidentally did
> themselves great harm when, by deliberate intent or accident, they
> succeeded in generating infrasonic vibrations. Tesla used
> vibrating platforms as an aid to vitality. He delighted in "toning the
> body" with vibrational platforms of his own design. Mounted
> on heavy rubber pads, these platforms were vibrated by simple motorized
> "eccentric" wheels.
>
> Their mild use, for a minute, could be pleasantly stimulating. The
> effects invigorating the whole body for hours thereafter.
> Excessive use would produce grave illness however, excessive
> aggravations of the heart being the most dangerous aspect of the
> stimulation. The entire body "rang" for hours with an elevated heart
> rate and greatly stimulated blood pressure. The effects
> could be deadly.
>
> In one historic instance, Samuel Clemens, Teslas close friend, refused
> to descend from the vibrating platform. Tesla was sorry
> he had allowed him to mount it. After repeated warnings, Teslas concern
> was drowned out by both the vibrating machine and
> Clemens jubilant exaltations and praises. Several more seconds and
> Clemens nearly soiled his white suit, the effects of
> infrasound being "duly recorded".
>
> Tesla often went to great lengths in describing the effects of
> infrasounds to newspaper reporters who, behind his back, scoffed
> at the notion that a "little sound" could effect such devastations. Yet,
> it was precisely with such a "little sound" that Tesla nearly
> brought down his laboratory on Houston Street. His compact infrasonic
> impulsers were terribly efficient. Tesla later designed
> and tested infrasonic impulse weapons capable of wrecking buildings and
> whole cities on command.
>
> Walt Disney and his artists were once made seriously ill when a sound
> effect, intended for a short cartoon scene, was slowed
> down several times on a tape machine and amplified through a theater
> sound system. The original sound source was a soldering
> iron, whose buzzing 60 cycle tone was lowered five times to 12 cycles.
> This tone produced a lingering nausea in the crew which
> lasted for days.
>
> Physiology seems to remain paralyzed by infrasound. Infrasound
> stimulates middle ear disruptions, ruining organismic
> equilibrium. The effect is like severe and prolonged seasickness.
> Infrasound immobilizes its victims. Restoration to normal
> vitality requires several hours, or even days. Exposure to mild
> infrasound intensities produces illness, but increased intensities
> result in death. Alarming responses to infrasound have been accurately
> recorded by military medical experts.
>
> Tolerances from 40 to 100 cycles per second have been recorded by
> military examiners. The results are sobering ones. As
> infrasonic pitches decrease, the deadly symptoms increase. Altered
> cardiac rhythms, with pulse rates rising to 40 percent of
> their rest values, are the precursors to other pre-lethal states. Mild
> nausea, giddiness, skin flushing, and body tingling occur at
> 100 cycles per second. Vertigo, anxiety, extreme fatigue, throat
> pressure, and respiratory dysfunction follow. Coughing, severe
> sternal pressure, choking, excessive salivation, extreme swallowing
> pains, inability to breathe, headache, and abdominal pain
> occur between 60 and 73 cycles per second. Post exposure fatigue is
> marked. Certain subjects continued to cough for half an
> hour, while many continued the skin-flush manifestation for up to four
> hours.
>
> Significant visual acuity decrements are noted when humans are exposed
> to infrasounds between 43 and 73 cycles per second.
> Intelligibility scores for persons exposed, fall to a low of 77 percent
> their normal scores. Spatial orientation becomes completely
> distorted. Muscular coordination and equilibrium falter considerably.
> Depressed manual dexterity and slurred speech have been
> noted before individuals blackout. Just before this point, a significant
> loss in intelligibility is noted.
>
> The findings of Dr. Gavreau in the infrasonic range between 1 and 10
> cycles per second are truly shocking. Lethal infrasonic
> pitch lies in the 7 cycle range. Small amplitude increases affect human
> behavior in this pitch range. Intellectual activity is first
> inhibited, blocked, and then destroyed. As the amplitude is increased,
> several disconcerting responses had been noted. These
> responses begin as complete neurological interference. The action of the
> medulla is physiologically blocked, its autonomic
> functions cease.
>
>
>
> WATCHMEN
>
> Infrasound clings to the ground, a phenomenon well known in the animal
> world. Female vocalizations and those of their young,
> take their traceable routes through the air. High pitched sounds are
> aerial in nature. This makes females and young natural
> targets for predators. Low pitched tones cling to the ground, being
> "guided" along the soil layers. Male vocalizations cannot be
> localized by predators. Male sounds "hug the ground", diffusing out from
> their source. Some males rumble the ground with
> voice and hooves. These are communications signals which they alone
> comprehend.
>
> The fact that the ground draws and guides low frequency tones is a
> remarkable gift to the animal kingdom, enhancing the
> survival of male leaders. When herds are attacked by predators, the
> males can continue to give guidance to their companions,
> while remaining completely "invisible" and elusive. Predators cannot
> locate the voices and rumblings of male leaders because
> their low pitched signals ar impossible to pinpoint. They are therefore
> also impossible to attack. Predators are often overtaken
> by the males who maintain their diffusive communications across and
> through the ground.
>
> The same analogies would apply to an infrasonic defense system. First,
> infrasound does not lose its intensity when travelling
> very long distances across the ground. They remain at the same intensity
> as when released from their deadly sources. Also,
> because of the ground clinging effect, infrasonic sources cannot be
> located without special appliances. This would work well for
> those who used the weaponry of infrasound. But suppose some hostile
> force were themselves using infrasonics? Infrasonics are
> inaudible. The battle would be over before anyone knew it had begun. How
> would one know of an infrasonic attack? The first
> line of defense would therefore be the detection of the "unperceived
> enemy". The development of an adequate infrasonic
> weapons systems would first require an infrasound detector.
>
> Dr. Gavreau first concentrated on developing infallible infrasonic
> detectors for the personal safety of his operators as well as for
> eventual tactical deployment. He experimented with several designs which
> followed the arcane analogues of old wireless
> detectors. One such design used enclosed flames to detect infrasonic
> pitches. They were reminiscent of those flame detectors
> developed by Lee De Forest just before his invention of the triode. The
> flame detectors of Gavreau employed variable resonant
> cavities. Flame amplitudes shifted with specific infrasonic pitches. He
> could calibrate the infrasonic intensity as well as the pitch
> with these detectors. But, flames are dangerous and fickle, not being
> very reliable in battle.
>
> Dr. Gavreau next experimented with enhanced mechanical barometers. These
> coupled large resonant cavities with very fine
> barometer tubes. They displayed great sensitivity. Steady increases in
> barometric pressure were registered when large cavity
> bellows were compressed by infrasounds. The sensitivity of these
> barometers increased as the bellows capacity was increased.
> They were adequate, but frail.
>
> Another embodiment resembled the early mechanical television designs of
> John Logie Baird. It utilized large tympani skins,
> mirrors, lights, and photocells. A mirror was fastened to the tympanum.
> A light beam flickered when infrasound struck the
> mirror. The photocell recorded these flickers as an electrical signal.
> This detector system was very reliable.
>
> By far, the most advanced detectors which gavreau designed and tested
> utilized an electrolytic process. In this analogue of
> systems developed by Fessenden to measure faint wireless signals,
> chemical solutions and fine wirepoint electrical contacts
> were used. Chemical solutions, separated by an osmotic barrier, were
> forced to migrate through the barriers whenever
> infrasound traversed the system. This chemical mixture was then measured
> as an increased electrical conductivity in a sensitive
> galvanometer. This system was reliable and accurate. All of these
> systems suffered from one possibility. The offensive use of an
> incredible infrasonic amplitude would burst them into vapor.
>
>
>
> ARMOR
>
> Claims were issued by french authorities, stating that Dr. Gavreau was
> not developing weapons at all. Several patents,
> however, betray this conspicuous smoke-screen. While it is impossible to
> retrieve the actual patents for the infrasonic
> generators, Dr. Gavreau is credited with extensive development of
> "infrasonic armor". Why would he "waste" such time and
> expense if not for an anti-weapons program?
>
> Thus use of infrasonic weaponry necessitates the development and
> implementation of infrasonic shields. Dr. Gavreau spent
> more time developing infrasonic shields than on developing efficient
> infrasonic horns. Infrasound could not adequately be
> blocked, as Dr. Gavreau discovered early in his research. Infrasonic
> devices require extremely large baffles.
>
> Furthermore, no one would dare initiate an infrasonic barrage on any
> invasive force without adequate protection. Infrasonic
> horns can project their sounds in a given direction, but natural
> environments "leak" portions of the sound in all directions.
> Infrasounds saturate their generators, flooding and permeating their
> sources in a few seconds. They "work their way back"
> toward those who dispatch their deadly signals. Infrasounds "hug the
> ground" and spread around their sources. Unfortunately,
> those who would release infrasonic energy would themselves be
> slaughtered in the very act.
>
> The first method of Gavreau involves the conversion of infrasound into
> successively higher pitches, until the infrasonic pitch is
> "lost". This was achieved in his passive "structural" method, an
> enormous layered series of baffles and resonant cavities. This
> form is "passive" since it merely stands and waits for infrasonic
> barrages, absorbing and converting them into harmless audible
> tones.
>
> The second method of Gavreau is more active and "aggressive". It
> actively engages and nullifies any offensive infrasonic power.
> The nullifier uses a well known physical principle for its operation. As
> an "active" shield, it transmits tones whose opposing
> wavefronts destructively interfere with incoming infrasound. Infrasonic
> attacks are nullified, or at least brought to much weaker
> levels.
>
> This method requires high speed detection and response systems. The
> process involves determination of an attack pitch,
> generation of the same, and projection of the pitch "out of phase". The
> active nullifier method is not completely accurate or
> protective by any means. A highly modulated, mobile infrasonic source
> would be nearly impossible to successfully neutralize
> without extremely sophisticated electronics.
>
> But an elegantly simple approach was imagined, one which would not
> require the defender to be exposed to his own infrasonic
> projections. While fixated on the old notion of gun installations and
> stations, Gavreau and the team had momentarily forgotten
> their first research endeavor. Robotics!
>
>
>
> THE HAMMER
>
> Let us recall that Dr. Gavreau and his team of pioneers were in the
> business of robotics. They developed industrial and military
> automaton systems. How difficult would it have been to couple his
> newfound weaponry with robotic applications? Dr. Gavreau
> combined the organ pipe and whistle format. The device was housed in a
> block of concrete. It was less than a cubic meter in
> volume. The primary whistle was poised within its interior. At its
> flared opening were placed several resonant pipes. The device
> was operated by highly compressed air. Its output was frightful. It was
> capable, in a conventional engagement, of utterly
> destroying an aggressor.
>
> This infrasound whistle design was once sealed in an 880 pound concrete
> pier for tests, a concrete baffle placed over its
> projective end. Even with these precautions, the device succeeded in
> absolutely shaking a fan-shaped portion of Marseille. It
> broke through its supportive concrete pier and destroyed the baffle
> covering in an instant. Macabre. No sound was ever heard.
>
> This design demonstrated great pitch selectivity, power, and
> directivity. In this last feature, Gavreau and his team achieved a
> safety factor of greatest value. Infrasonic defensive armaments could
> now be safely directed away from the operators against
> any foe. This weapon was a remarkably compact and efficient device. Its
> efficiency was gauged by the destructive output and
> the weapon volume.
>
> A later embodiment of this terror disclosed another compact cube. The
> infrasonic whistle was presumably housed therein.
> Proceeding from the front plate were some sixty pipes, flared horns
> aimed in deadly forward array. It was said that this device
> alone, remotely guided into an arranged artificial battlefield, burst
> heavy battlements and tank interiors open with a hideous
> effortlessness. In addition, several other more frightening and
> unmentionable disruptions were observed with equal
> effectiveness. In each, not a sound was ever heard.
>
> The device was mounted and mobilized. A robotic vehicle. Powered by
> diesel engines or compressed gas, the almost
> insignificant unit would be a bizarre foe for an army to engage.
> Preliminary experiments had proven the extreme danger of
> loosing infrasonic power among Gavreau and his workers. Without
> automatic remote control mechanisms each technician
> would succumb to the deadly sound and die, while the machine kept
> broadcasting its deadly sound. As defensive weaponry,
> such a device would be terrible and effective. The system would be a
> true deterrent for those who would be foolish enough to
> attempt ground assault on any nation so armed. Armies would fall flat.
> Once the infrasonic horns were unleashed against the
> foe, the battle would not even begin.
>
> Such a war engine would be impossible to locate. None who saw its size
> would believe it to contain such a lethal power. Most
> would overlook the device completely. A flood of such devices, each
> emanating a peculiar highly modulated blend of
> infrasound, would be an unstoppable wall. Robotic tanks equipped with
> infrasonic generators could sweep an area with deadly
> infrasound, destroying all opponents to within a five mile radius. These
> terrible infrasonic weapons could easily be secured in
> drone jets, where aerial assaults could quickly and methodically waste
> any offensive approaching army.
>
> Deterring would-be aerial attackers could be equally devastating for the
> offenders. Infrasonic beacons could sweep and scan
> the skies with a deadly accuracy. Infrasound passes through all matter
> with equal effectiveness, seeking out offenders with
> deadly consequence. The intensities which the Gavreau devices
> effectively broadcast into the environment are frightening. In
> these devices we see the perfection of phenomena which never naturally
> occur in such dangerous intensities. This is why these
> weapons must be deployed by remote control, operating as automatons at
> great distances from their operators.
>
> Weapons are made to defend, not to offend. In Gavreaus own words:
> "There does not exist complete protection against
> infrasound. It is not absorbed by ordinary matter, walls and chambers do
> not suffice to arrest it". And so, once again, we stand
> at the cross-roads. We are called, summoned to appear before two
> pathways. On the one, we hear Messaien and the musical
> messages of peace. On the other, Gavreau and the musical messages of
> war. And again we choose. And again we must
> choose. Whose music will it be?

A mógłbyś przy okazji to przetłumaczyć?

pozdrawiam

› Pokaż wiadomość z nagłówkami

Do góry

Zobacz także

2. Data: 2002-02-27 08:22:05

Temat: Re: Praca badawcza nt. oddzialywania infradzwiekow w budynkach/ biurach (dlugie)
Od: "Adam 'Rolek' Rolbiecki" <a...@g...pl> szukaj wiadomości tego autora

Użytkownik "howk" <n...@p...onet.pl> napisał
w wiadomości news:a5i3rp$fvr$1@news.onet.pl...
[...]
>
> A mógłbyś przy okazji to przetłumaczyć?

A mógłbyś NIE CYTOWAĆ CAŁEGO tekstu, jeśli Twoja wypowiedź wnosi tak
wiele do dyskusji???

Jedno zdanie na 618 linii tekstu. Gratuluję intelektu.

--
Pozdrawiam,
Adam 'Rolek' Rolbiecki
[This mail is ozone friendly and was not tested on animals]

› Pokaż wiadomość z nagłówkami

Do góry

3. Data: 2002-02-27 08:36:47

Temat: Re: Praca badawcza nt. oddzialywania infradzwiekow w budynkach/ biurach (dlugie)
Od: "howk" <n...@p...onet.pl> szukaj wiadomości tego autora

Użytkownik "Adam 'Rolek' Rolbiecki" <a...@g...pl> napisał w wiadomości
news:a5i511$q8d$1@news.tpi.pl...
> Użytkownik "howk" <n...@p...onet.pl> napisał
> w wiadomości news:a5i3rp$fvr$1@news.onet.pl...
> [...]
> >
> > A mógłbyś przy okazji to przetłumaczyć?
>
> A mógłbyś NIE CYTOWAĆ CAŁEGO tekstu, jeśli Twoja wypowiedź wnosi tak
> wiele do dyskusji???
>
> Jedno zdanie na 618 linii tekstu. Gratuluję intelektu.

Twoje zdanie za to strasznie dużo wnosi do dyskusji.
Gratuluję intelektu.

pozdrawiam

› Pokaż wiadomość z nagłówkami

Do góry

4. Data: 2002-02-27 08:47:56

Temat: Re: Praca badawcza nt. oddzialywania infradzwiekow w budynkach/ biurach (dlugie)
Od: "Aleksy Kordiukiewicz" <a...@a...com.pl> szukaj wiadomości tego autora

Użytkownik "Adam 'Rolek' Rolbiecki" <a...@g...pl> napisał w wiadomości
news:a5i511$q8d$1@news.tpi.pl...
> Użytkownik "howk" <n...@p...onet.pl> napisał
> w wiadomości news:a5i3rp$fvr$1@news.onet.pl...
> [...]
> >
> > A mógłbyś przy okazji to przetłumaczyć?
>
> A mógłbyś NIE CYTOWAĆ CAŁEGO tekstu, jeśli Twoja wypowiedź wnosi tak
> wiele do dyskusji???
>
> Jedno zdanie na 618 linii tekstu. Gratuluję intelektu.

Po co się denerwujesz? Wstawiasz gościa do filtra i po kłopocie!

Pozdrowienia

--
Aleksy Kordiukiewicz
mailto:a...@a...com.pl
http://www.aval.com.pl/ (o firmie, poradnik, katalog, cenniki)
ANTENY, TV-SAT, ANTENY ZBIOROWE, TVK, TELEFONY
DOMOFONY, ALARMY, TV UŻYTKOWA, KASETKI, ZAMKI

› Pokaż wiadomość z nagłówkami

Do góry

5. Data: 2002-02-27 09:02:58

Temat: Re: Praca badawcza nt. oddzialywania infradzwiekow w budynkach/ biurach (dlugie)
Od: "howk" <n...@p...onet.pl> szukaj wiadomości tego autora

Użytkownik "Aleksy Kordiukiewicz" <a...@a...com.pl> napisał w wiadomości
news:a5i6qk$ap5$1@news.tpi.pl...
>
> Użytkownik "Adam 'Rolek' Rolbiecki" <a...@g...pl> napisał w wiadomości
> news:a5i511$q8d$1@news.tpi.pl...
> > Użytkownik "howk" <n...@p...onet.pl> napisał
> > w wiadomości news:a5i3rp$fvr$1@news.onet.pl...
> > [...]
> > >
> > > A mógłbyś przy okazji to przetłumaczyć?
> >
> > A mógłbyś NIE CYTOWAĆ CAŁEGO tekstu, jeśli Twoja wypowiedź wnosi tak
> > wiele do dyskusji???
> >
> > Jedno zdanie na 618 linii tekstu. Gratuluję intelektu.
>
> Po co się denerwujesz? Wstawiasz gościa do filtra i po kłopocie!

Ooo właśnie :))
Twoja wypowiedź wnosi tak
> > wiele do dyskusji???
Gratuluję intelektu.

pozdrawiam