Iwon(K)a wrote:
> zeusx <z...@p...onet.pl> napisał(a):
>
>>> wcale to nie swiadczy ze jest to polaczone zwiazkiem przyczynowo
>>> skutkowym.
>>> (i ktory to kraj?)
>> Uganda. Pewno to sprawa klimatu.
>> http://www.pro-life.org.pl/2008/07/uganda-sukces-w-w
alce-z-aids.html
>> zx
>>
> http://www.avert.org/aids-uganda.htm
>
> This is generally thought to have been the result of behaviour changes such
> as increased abstinence and monogamy, a rise in the average age of first
> sex, a reduction in the average number of sexual partners and more frequent
> use of condoms.
> There are indications that Uganda&#8217;s HIV prevalence may once again be on the
> rise.
> i co najwazniejsze
> _Pro-abstinence-only organisations are increasingly using Uganda as an
> example to indicate the success of their methods. But this is inappropriate,
> since the multiplicity of prevention methods used in Uganda mean that the
> decline in HIV prevalence was certainly not due to abstinence-only messages_.

Tak to jest jak ktoś powołuje się na informacje mocno przetworzone i
poobcinane...

Stalker