Re: Zarowki energooszczedne - ktore ?

« poprzedni post

Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.wp.pl!not-for-mail
From: " 666" <j...@w...eu>
Newsgroups: pl.rec.dom
Subject: Re: Zarowki energooszczedne - ktore ?
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:30:04 +0200
Organization: Wirtualna Polska S.A. http://www.wp.pl
Lines: 8
Sender: j...@d...neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
Message-ID: <ev53op$ss8$1@news.wp.pl>
References: <eumiof$mmj$1@inews.gazeta.pl> <euno21$5mc$1@news.onet.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: doq28.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.wp.pl 1175851609 29576 83.24.124.28 (6 Apr 2007 09:26:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: a...@w...pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:26:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Organization-Notice: Organization line has been filtered
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Original-Organization: Wirtualna Polska S.A. http://www.wp.pl
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.rec.dom:87960
Ukryj nagłówki

Chyba Polux.
Też nie narzekam (moc 30 Wat).
JaC