Data: 2005-06-18 20:41:44
Temat: Re: Co myślicie o irydologach ?
Od: Piotr Kasztelowicz <p...@a...torun.pl>
Pokaż wszystkie nagłówki
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, ika wrote:
>
> Poszłam z ciekawości po więcej i znalazłam
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Re
trieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12723182&qu
ery_hl=1
>
> Oftalmologia. 2002;55(4):64-9.
> [Correlation between iridology and general pathology]
> [Article in Romanian]
> Demea S.
> Spitalul Orasenesc Huedin, Judetul Cluj.
>
> PURPOSE: The research proposal is to evaluate the association between
> certain irian signs and general pathology of studied patients. METHOD:
> There were studied 57 hospitalized patients; there was taken over all
> their iris images, which were analyzed through iridological protocols; in
> the same time the pathology of these patients was noted from their records
> in the hospital, concordant with the clinical diagnosis; all these
> information were included in a database for a computerised processing.
> RESULTS: The correlations resulted from, shows a high connection between
> the irian constitution establish through iridological criteria and the
> existent pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Iris examination can be very useful for
> diagnosis of a certain general pathology, in a holistic approach of the
> patient.
jasne ale zobacz jaka gazete cytujesz a jaka cytowal Marek
- chodzi o prestiz i klase ... .
Poza tym material obejmuje "az" 57 pacjentow
To, ze Medline to cytuje to prawo ale trzeba patrzec na pewne
doniesienia takze krytycznie
P.
--
Piotr Kasztelowicz P...@a...torun.pl
http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz
http://www.am.torun.pl
PGP Key IDs: DH/DSS:0xF3EED8AF
|