Data: 2005-06-18 10:42:55
Temat: Re: Co myślicie o irydologach ?
Od: ika <i...@s...wody>
Pokaż wszystkie nagłówki
Dnia 18.06.05, około 12:19, Marek Bieniek bulgocze
<news:11eq8olitnoqk.dlg@always.coca.cola>:
> Po więcej - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Pub
Med
Poszłam z ciekawości po więcej i znalazłam
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Re
trieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12723182&qu
ery_hl=1
Oftalmologia. 2002;55(4):64-9.
[Correlation between iridology and general pathology]
[Article in Romanian]
Demea S.
Spitalul Orasenesc Huedin, Judetul Cluj.
PURPOSE: The research proposal is to evaluate the association between
certain irian signs and general pathology of studied patients. METHOD:
There were studied 57 hospitalized patients; there was taken over all
their iris images, which were analyzed through iridological protocols; in
the same time the pathology of these patients was noted from their records
in the hospital, concordant with the clinical diagnosis; all these
information were included in a database for a computerised processing.
RESULTS: The correlations resulted from, shows a high connection between
the irian constitution establish through iridological criteria and the
existent pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Iris examination can be very useful for
diagnosis of a certain general pathology, in a holistic approach of the
patient.
;)
--
ika - umop apisdn
|