On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:47:02 +0200, WOJSAL wrote:

> I dlatego, nie tyle chcialem tu dyskutowac,
> co raczej dowiedziec sie cos
> wiecej o irydologii, jej wadach, zaletach.

Nie mogłem sie powstrzymać. Jeszcze jeden artykuł:

Forsch Komplementarmed. 1999 Feb;6(1):7-9. Related Articles, Links

Iridology: A systematic review.

Ernst E.

Department of Complementary Medicine, School of Postgraduate
Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, UK.
E...@e...ac.uk

BACKGROUND: Iridologists claim to be able to diagnose medical
conditions through abnormalities of pigmentation in the iris. This
technique is popular in many countries. Therefore it is relevant to ask
whether it is valid. Aim: To systematically review all interpretable
tests of the validity of iridology as a diagnostic tool. DATA SOURCE AND
EXTRACTION: Three independent literature searches were performed to
identify all blinded tests. Data were extracted in a predefined,
standardized fashion. MAIN RESULTS: Four case control studies were
found. The majority of these investigations suggests that iridology is
not a valid diagnostic method. Conclusion: The validity of iridology as
a diagnostic tool is not supported by scientific evaluations. Patients
and therapists should be discouraged from using this method.

Zwróć uwagę na tytuł czasopisma!

m.
--
Pozdrawiam,
Marek Bieniek (mbieniek na epic pl)
Problem nie w nauce, lecz w tym, jaki ludzie robią z niej użytek.
/Wilder Penfield/