Re: Montignac vs Atkinson?
| « poprzedni post | |
|
Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!pingwin.icm.edu.pl!warszawa.rmf.pl!newsfeed.tpinternet. pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail From: "em" <e...@p...promail.pl> Newsgroups: pl.rec.kuchnia Subject: Re: Montignac vs Atkinson? Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:54:42 +0200 Organization: tp.internet - http://www.tpi.pl Lines: 16 Message-ID: <9nik7k$bjp$2@news.tpi.pl> References: <9n2a0t$350$1@news.tpi.pl> <9ng00l$eva$1@news.tpi.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: ph75.gdansk.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl X-Trace: news.tpi.pl 1000133684 11897 217.99.192.75 (10 Sep 2001 14:54:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: u...@t...pl NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Sep 2001 14:54:44 GMT X-Notice-1: This post has been postprocessed on the news.tpi.pl server. X-Notice-2: Subject line has been filtered and leading Odp: string removed. X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2417.2000 X-Subject: Odp: Montignac vs Atkinson? X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.rec.kuchnia:67454 Ukryj nagłówki > Wg mnie metoda jest skuteczna i latwa, ale pod warunkiem, | |
Zobacz także
