Data: 2001-11-11 06:39:35
Temat: Re: Prady selektywne-?
Od: f...@...com (Have a nice day!)
Pokaż wszystkie nagłówki
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 07:34:07 +0100, jacek <j...@w...pl> wrote:
>Witraj!
>
>In article <3...@n...powersurfr.com>, f...@...com says...
>> >> Blona po kilku minutach ulegala uszkodzeniu ,co powodowalo pozadany
>> >> efekt. Obserwujac zywe komorki Rife odnalazl wiele czestotliwosci
>> >> ktore skutecznie niszczyly wirusy np grozlicy herpes-a czy ospy.
>> >
>> >Kurna! Pogubilem sie zupelnie - a czy on przez przypadek nie wynalazl
>> >nowej medycyny???
>> Kurna sie nie mylisz!!!!!!!!!!!
>> Wlasnie o to chodzi ze wynalazl nowa medycyne - i dla tego zrodilo to
>> taka opozycje wsrod lekarzy
>
>Naprawde wywolalo opozycje?
>
>> >Wirus gruzlicy???? Wirus nowotworowy?????????
>> >B?ona komorkowa wirusów??????
>> Za slowka mnie tu nie lap bo ja to na szybko tlumaczylem z
>> angielskiego i pewnie go nie znam tak doskonale jak ty..
>> Wlasnie wirus nowotworowy jak poszukasz to znajdziesz zdjecie
>> preparatu mikroskopowego.
>> Ale jak wnioskuje z poprzednich twoich postow i tak w to nie uwierzysz
>> bo przeciez ciebie tego w szkolach nie uczyli .Czyli marnowanie czasu
>
>Klopot w tym ze ja uwierze we wszystko co jest spojne i rzetelne.
>Jak mam wierzyc facetowi ktory twierdzi zw wynalaz genialna nowa metode
>lecznia skoro ta metoda chce leczyc wirusy gruzlicy i ze ta metoda dziala
>na blony komorkowe wirusow?
>http://www.rt66.com/~rifetech/ tu znajdziesz zdjecie Paramecium Caudatum po
potraktowaniu 1150 Hz
>Dla nie w temacie: gruzlice wywoluje bakteria - pratek gruzlicy. A wirusy
>nie maja zadnej blony komorkowej.
Pewnie ze nie maja ale za to maja mase i jakies wymiary , w zwiazku z
czym podlegaja rezonansowi jak wszystkie ciala majace jakas mase.
>Poczatkow myslalem ze faktycznie po prostu przetlumaczyles niewprawnie te
>terminy - ale nie: nawet jesli tlumaczyles zle to nie mogles sam w jeden
>wor wrzucic leczenia ta metoda gruzlicy i opryszczki. Widac autor metody
>nie rozroznia bakterii od wirusow
Autor je rozroznia za to tobie nie chcialo sie przeczytac dokladnie o
co chodzi albo przecenilem twoja znajomosc angielskiego.
>No i ten mikroskop - jesli wirusy maja wymiary 15-300nm a swiatlo ma
>dlugosc fali 380-750 nm nie zastanawia cie JAK on je mogl zobaczyc w
>mikroskopie optycznycm (nawet idealnym)?
The largest and most powerful of these, the Universal Microscope,
developed in 1933, consists of 5,682 parts and is so called because of
its adaptability in all fields of microscopical work, being fully
equipped with separate substage condenser units for transmitted and
monochromatic beam dark-field, polarized, and slit-ultra illumination,
including also a special device for crystallography. The entire
optical system of lenses and prisms as well as the illuminating units
are made of block-crystal quartz, quartz being especially transparent
to ultraviolet radiations.
This illuminating unit used for examining the filterable forms of
disease organisms contains 14 lenses and prisms, 3 of which are in the
high-intensity incandescent lamp, 4 in the Risley prism, and 7 in the
achromatic condenser which, incidentally, has a numerical aperture of
1.40. Between the source of light and the specimen are subtended two
circular, wedge-shaped, block-crystal quartz prisms for the purpose of
polarizing the light passing through the specimen, polarization being
the practical application of the theory that light waves vibrate in
all planes perpendicular to the direction in which they are
propagated.
Therefore, when light comes into contact with a polarizing prism, it
is divided or split into two beams, one of which is refracted to such
an extent that it is reflected to the side of the prism without, of
course, passing through the prism while the second ray, bent
considerably less, is thus enabled to pass through the prism to
illuminate the specimen.
When the quartz prisms on the universal microscope, which may be
rotated with vernier control through 360 degrees, are rotated in
opposite directions, they serve to bend the transmitted beams of light
at variable angles of incidence while, at the same time, a spectrum is
projected up into the axis of the microscope, or rather a small
portion of the spectrum to the other, going all the way from the
infrared to the ultraviolet.
NOW, WHEN THAT PORTION OF THE SPECTRUM IS REACHED IN WHICH BOTH THE
ORGANISM AND THE COLOR BAND VIBRATE IN EXACT ACCORD, ONE WITH THE
OTHER, A DEFINITE CHARACTERISTIC SPECTRUM IS EMITTED BY THE ORGANISM.
In the case of the filter-passing form of the BACILLUS TYPHOSUS, for
instance, A BLUE SPECTRUM IS EMITTED AND THE PLANE OF POLARIZATION
DEVIATED PLUS (+) 4.8 DEGREES.
The predominating chemical constituents of the organism are next
ascertained after which the quartz prisms are adjusted or set, by
means of vernier control, to minus (-) 4.8 degrees (again in the case
of the filter-passing form of the BACILLUS TYPHOSUS) so that the
opposite angle of refraction may be obtained.
A MONOCHROMATIC BEAM OF LIGHT, CORRESPONDING **EXACTLY** TO THE
FREQUENCY OF THE ORGANISM (for Dr.Rife has found that EACH DISEASE
ORGANISM RESPONDS TO AND HAS A DEFINITE AND DISTINCT WAVE LENGTH, a
fact confirmed by British medical research workers) IS THEN SENT UP
THROUGH THE SPECIMEN AND THE DIRECT TRANSMITTED LIGHT, THUS ENABLING
THE OBSERVER TO VIEW THE ORGANISM STAINED IN ITS TRUE CHEMICAL COLOR
and revealing ITS OWN INDIVIDUAL STRUCTURE IN A FIELD WHICH IS
BRILLIANT WITH LIGHT.
Jesli czegos nie zrozumiales to napisz - nie krytykuj
Recent research at the Louis Pasteur University in Strasbourg France,
and at the NEC Research Institute in Princeton, NJ has shown that
light can be squeezed through holes as much as 10 times smaller than
it's wavelength!
>Moze troche fizyki ze szkoly sredniej?
Daje ci przyklad ze to ty jestes troche nie douczony -wiec troche
wiecej pokory w stosunku do nauki - ktora poszla nieco do przodu od
czasow twojej szkoly sredniej.
>
>Nie wmawiaj mi niecheci do nowosci tylko dlatego ze oczekuje uczciwosci i
>rzetelnosci.
Jescze raz - zanim cos skrytykujesz najpierw zadaj sobie troche trudu
i przeczytaj o co chodzi - a jesli twoj angielski jest na to za slaby
to po prostu nie zabieraj glosu na ten temat bo sie tylko osmieszasz.
|